Friday, September 2, 2016

Five Stars Fujian released after a month from Australia

SEPTEMBER 1ST, 2016
The Australian Maritime Safety Authority (AMSA) has banned the Hong Kong flagged bulk carrier Five Stars Fujian from Australian ports for 12 months.
The Five Stars Fujian has been detained by AMSA off Gladstone since 12 August after AMSA surveyors found the vessel did not have sufficient provisions for its intended voyage and the crew of 20 had not been paid in several months. 
The vessel had been at anchor off Gladstone since July when it was arrested by the Federal Court over a commercial matter.
Since the vessel was detained, AMSA has been in regular contact with the owners of the ship, Five Stars Fujian Shipping Co of Hong Kong, to resolve the matters concerning outstanding wages and resupply of the vessel.
AMSA received confirmation on Thursday that outstanding crew wages have been paid, the vessel resupplied with fuel and that sufficient provisions are on board for the vessel’s safe passage. An AMSA inspector attended the vessel to conduct a final inspection and confirm with the crew readiness to sail. The ship has therefore been released from detention at 1300 this afternoon.
Once the detention was lifted AMSA immediately issued the master with a direction notice banning the operators from bringing the vessel to any Australian port for 12 months.
AMSA General Manager of Ship Safety Allan Schwartz said that the conduct of the Five Stars Fujian Shipping Co was completely unacceptable. “The crew of the Five Stars Fujianhave been forsaken off the Australian coast for over two months, with limited supplies and thousands of dollars of unpaid wages,” Schwartz said. “This is a completely unacceptable way for a company to treat their crew and this kind of conduct will not be tolerated in Australia.
“While we are pleased that ultimately the issues of outstanding wages and supplies was able to be resolved by those associated with the ship, the amount of time it has taken has been extraordinary. AMSA hopes that this banning will serve as a warning to other shipping companies that if they wish to do business in Australian waters they must abide by their international obligations and manage their crew in a proper manner.”
The International Transport Workers’ Federation has been appalled by situation especially considering the vessel is carrying up to $40 million of coal loaded at Hay Point, Australia.
ITF Assistant Coordinator Matt Purcell said: “This whole scenario is a disgrace. Even when they were being paid, the crew was barely receiving $2 an hour, which is well below international standards. At a time when the Australian shipping industry is being decimated, this is just another blight on the Federal Government for allowing this type of dodgy foreign operator on our coast.”
source: The Maritime Executive LLC.

Vogemann launches OPEX guarantee scheme

AUGUST 24TH, 2016

Germany’s H. Vogemann shipping group has launched an operating expenditure (OPEX) guarantee scheme for owners of dry bulk and multipurpose vessels.

The guarantee itself is based on a predefined budget and covers cost items for technical management such as crew, maintenance, stores, lubricants and so on for ships technically managed and manned by Vogemann.

The scheme guarantees up to a maximum of $182,500 for a revolving period of one-year, which Vogemann said is approximately 150% of the vessel’s management fee.

The guarantee contains not only the amount of OPEX but also a maintenance-level warranty that will be controlled by a third-party surveyor.

“It was our aim to create a straight, clear and fair product, therefore the maintenance level must be watched closely since a lower OPEX could also be achieved by neglecting the condition of the vessel,” said Jens Arndt, group managing director of H Vogemann.

The guarantee scheme has been designed in connection with warehouse solutions for banks or investors that
need reliable cost planning and reliable performance from their managers, the company said.

Source:splash247

Wednesday, August 31, 2016

Debt protection metrics of steel players to remain depressed in near term

August 30, 2016, 

Imposition of provisional anti-dumping duty (ADD) on hot-rolled and cold-rolled coils for six months will help domestic flat steel players overcome challenges posed by a weak domestic demand, said ICRA in its report today.
Additionally, the extension of minimum import price (MIP) on a trimmed list of steel products for two months will benefit the industry, especially long steel players which do not attract any ADD as of now, it said.
India's steel imports, which fell by around 29 percent on year-on-year in the April to June quarter of the current financial year largely due to MIP and Safeguard Duty(SGD), are expected to reduce further in the coming months, thus helping domestic mills regain lost market share,"the report quoted Jayanta Roy, senior vice-president and co-head, corporate sector ratings as saying.
Domestic hot-rolled coil (HRC) prices witnessed a drop in July 2016 on account of weak demand and subdued Chinese export prices. However, after the imposition of ADD in August 2016, HRC prices have increased by Rs. 1,500 per tonne, and are expected to remain buoyant in the near term as domestic HRC prices are still cheaper than landed cost of Chinese import offers by about 13 percent. Nevertheless, in ICRA's opinion, given the marginal demand growth of 0.4 percent in Q1 FY2017 and an overcapacity-related concern in the domestic market, steelprices are unlikely to increase significantly from the current levels unless demand growth strengthens. In such a scenario, an expected revival in rural demand following a normal monsoon after two years, and the likely rise in discretionary consumption after the 7th Pay Commission payouts, remain critical for an improvement in domestic steel consumption in the second half of FY2017.
On the raw material front, India's iron ore production has increased by almost 35 percent YoY in Q1 FY2017, on the back of a 23 percent YoY growth registered in FY2016, being led by rising supplies primarily from Odisha and Goa. With domestic crude steel production growing by a modest 0.9 percent and 4.8 percent YoY in FY2016 and Q1 FY2017 respectively, domestic iron ore prices have remained under pressure, correcting by around 13 percent between April and August of 2016. However, spot prices of coking and thermal coal have witnessed a sharp increase of about 39 percent and 20 percent respectively since end May 2016, which is likely to increase the cost of production of blast furnace operators and sponge iron players respectively. Consequently, ICRAestimates that notwithstanding the lower price of iron ore between May and August of 2016, cost of major raw materials is expected to increase by around Rs 1,580 per tonne for blast furnace players, and by around Rs 390 per tonne for sponge iron manufacturers dependent on imported coal.
Domestic steel prices have increased in the second week of August 2016 post the imposition of ADD. However, given the weak domestic demand, the extent of increase has been only around 5 percent from the July 2016 levels, and currently remains lower than the previous peak levels achieved towards the end of May 2016.
"Steel demand in India remains soft during the second quarter because of lower construction activities during monsoon. This, coupled with the higher coal costs, and a limited price rise off late, will keep the operating profit margins of domestic steel companies under pressure in the current quarter", Roy added. Also, debt coverage indicators of the leading four domestic steel players (accounting for around 45% of the current domestic capacity) have deteriorated significantly in the last few years, with the total debt to operating profit and interest coverage ratios falling to 9.6 time and 1.3 time only in FY2016. The situation in case of mid-sized steel players is even more worrying. Given the significantly high debt levels contracted by these companies in the last few years, ICRA expects debt protection metrics of steel players to remain depressed in the near term.
Source :business-standard

Anti-dumping duty to help domestic steel firms overcome weak demand:ICRA

Debt protection metrics of steel players to remain depressed in near term (August 30, 2016)

Imposition of provisional anti-dumping duty (ADD) on hot-rolled and cold-rolled coils for six months will help domestic flat steel players overcome challenges posed by a weak domestic demand, said ICRA in its report today.
Additionally, the extension of minimum import price (MIP) on a trimmed list of steel products for two months will benefit the industry, especially long steel players which do not attract any ADD as of now, it said.
"India's steel imports, which fell by around 29 percent on year-on-year in the April to June quarter of the current financial year largely due to MIP and Safeguard Duty(SGD), are expected to reduce further in the coming months, thus helping domestic mills regain lost market share,"the report quoted Jayanta Roy, senior vice-president and co-head, corporate sector ratings as saying.
Domestic hot-rolled coil (HRC) prices witnessed a drop in July 2016 on account of weak demand and subdued Chinese export prices. However, after the imposition of ADD in August 2016, HRC prices have increased by Rs. 1,500 per tonne, and are expected to remain buoyant in the near term as domestic HRC prices are still cheaper than landed cost of Chinese import offers by about 13 percent. Nevertheless, in ICRA's opinion, given the marginal demand growth of 0.4 percent in Q1 FY2017 and an overcapacity-related concern in the domestic market, steel prices are unlikely to increase significantly from the current levels unless demand growth strengthens. In such a scenario, an expected revival in rural demand following a normal monsoon after two years, and the likely rise in discretionary consumption after the 7th Pay Commission payouts, remain critical for an improvement in domestic steel consumption in the second half of FY2017.
On the raw material front, India's iron ore production has increased by almost 35 percent YoY in Q1 FY2017, on the back of a 23 percent YoY growth registered in FY2016, being led by rising supplies primarily from Odisha and Goa. With domestic crude steel production growing by a modest 0.9 percent and 4.8 percent YoY in FY2016 and Q1 FY2017 respectively, domestic iron ore prices have remained under pressure, correcting by around 13 percent between April and August of 2016. However, spot prices of coking and thermal coal have witnessed a sharp increase of about 39 percent and 20 percent respectively since end May 2016, which is likely to increase the cost of production of blast furnace operators and sponge iron players respectively.

Consequently, ICRAestimates that notwithstanding the lower price of iron ore between May and August of 2016, cost of major raw materials is expected to increase by around Rs 1,580 per tonne for blast furnace players, and by around Rs 390 per tonne for sponge iron manufacturers dependent on imported coal.
Domestic steel prices have increased in the second week of August 2016 post the imposition of ADD. However, given the weak domestic demand, the extent of increase has been only around 5 percent from the July 2016 levels, and currently remains lower than the previous peak levels achieved towards the end of May 2016.
"Steel demand in India remains soft during the second quarter because of lower construction activities during monsoon. This, coupled with the higher coal costs, and a limited price rise off late, will keep the operating profit margins of domestic steel companies under pressure in the current quarter", Roy added. Also, debt coverage indicators of the leading four domestic steel players (accounting for around 45% of the current domestic capacity) have deteriorated significantly in the last few years, with the total debt to operating profit and interest coverage ratios falling to 9.6 time and 1.3 time only in FY2016. The situation in case of mid-sized steel players is even more worrying. Given the significantly high debt levels contracted by these companies in the last few years, ICRA expects debt protection metrics of steel players to remain depressed in the near term.
Source:Business Standard

Coking coal imports in India may firm upto 50 million tonnes

A rise of 14% over 43.7 mnt imported in 2015
Coking coal imports by Indian steel makers are pegged at 50 million tonnes (mt) in calendar 2016, a 14 per cent increase over 43.7 mnt imported in 2015.
Inbound coking coal shipments are set to go up on the back of revival in the steel industry thanks to favourable factors such as minimum import price and imposition of safeguard duty.
According to analysts, limited domestic availability of the steel making ingredient would fuel more imports.
“Imported coking coal accounted for two-third of the totalcoal consumption by the steel sector in India. According to the commerce and industry ministry, India imported 43.5 mnt of coking coal in 2015. Considering the limited scope of increase in domestic coal production, India may have increased dependency on imports of coking coal to meet the significant proportion of the demand,” said Pukhraj Sethiya, associate director (mining and metals) at PricewaterhouseCoopers (PwC). India’s crude steel production capacity is estimated at 300 mnt by 2025, a three-fold increase from the present level.
According to the PwC analyst cited above, any increase incoking coal demand would need to be met through imports.
Coking coal prices in the international markets have been declining for the past two years, making imports of the material cheaper and a workable option for steel companies in India. From the level of $216.8 a tonne in 2012, Australian benchmark metallurgicalcoal contract prices have tanked to $85.6 a tonne in 2016 according to Resources & Energy Quarterly, Office of Chief Economist, Australia. The price outlook is expected to stay subdued and is projected at $78.3 a tonne in 2017, Sethiya added.
Manish Kharbanda, executive director and group head (mines & minerals), Jindal Steel & Power Ltd (JSPL) said, “The revival of steel demand in the country and enhanced capacity utlisation thereof is expected to push up coking coal consumption & will be fueling coking coal imports too. However, a 2.5 per cent import duty on coking coal & a clean energy cess of Rs 400 per tonne is affecting the industry margins significantly especially at a time when the market is highly volatile. Indian steel industry has requested to the finance ministry to abolish the 2.5 per cent import duty on coking coal, a scarce commodity in India.”
Coking coal imports may firm up

To give a fillip to coking coal imports, the Government of India is understood to have initiated steps to cut import duty.
Ranjan Mishra, executive director, Visa Steel, said: “As steel makers look at greater capacity utilisation, they will need to import more of coking coal. Additionally, the Government of India's proposal to lift import duty on coking coal and keeping the commodity out of clean cess will boost imports.”
According to Union commerce and industry ministry and International Energy Agency data, the global seaborne coking coal trade volume was 276.3 mnt in 2015.

Source : Business Standard

Coal India to produce 71.7 mt coking coal by FY20

NEW DELHI: Coal India Limited has targeted to produce 71.77 million tonnes of coking coal of the total production of 1,000 million tonnes by 2019-20. Coking coal production stood at 53.8 million tonnes in 2015-16, power, coal, renewable energy and mines minister Piyush Goyal said on Thursday. 

The initiative aims at reducing imports of coking coal.

The enhancement in domestic production of coking coal is envisaged to reduce coking coal imports. However reduction of coking coal imports totally would not be possible due to the constraint of availability of metallurgical grade coal from domestic sources", he said in a written reply to a question in Lok Sabha. australia will remain major source of import for Coking coal in India. Coal India ltd is also working on aquring mines in S.africa.



Thermal coal market analysts pinpoint Southeast Asia region for standout growth

-29 Aug 2016 349 am EDT/749 GMT

Southeast Asian countries including Malaysia, Thailand and Vietnam are seen as growth markets for the consumption of imported thermal coal in the years out to 2020, as coal-fired electricity is used to fuel their fast-growing economies, said analysts at the 11th Coaltrans Australia conference in Sydney last week.

In a 10-year outlook for the Asia seaborne thermal coal market, Mark Gresswell, chief analyst at Australian mining consultancy group HDR Salva said three-and-a-half billion people are living on electricity consumption below the level in Japan.

"Eight of the most populous countries are in Asia, and 54% of the world's population live in Asia," he said.

To move these people to Japanese levels of power consumption will require an extra 4,300 TW of electricity generation.

This step change in levels of power generation in Asia will require an 80% increase in global coal production.

Coal-fired power generation is a relatively cheap source of energy at $30/MWh, and is less than half the cost of generating electricity from gas at $65/MWh, said Gresswell.

"This is why coal will have a big role to play in Asia," he said.

Nuclear electricity generation has come under scrutiny in Asia following the tragic accident at Japan's Fukushima-Daiichi plant in 2011, and some Asian nations have lowered their projected share of this fuel in their future generation mix.

Japan's long-range plan is to draw 20%-22% of its electricity production from nuclear plants, and South Korea has a target for nuclear power generation of 30% by 2030, down from 41% previously.

"Local communities are very concerned about having nuclear plants in their backyards," he said.

And, the only real alternative fuel to nuclear is coal, he stated.

MARKET IN TRANSITION

Gresswell characterized 2016 as a year as a year of "transition" for the seaborne market for thermal coal, as it moves from a supply surplus to a supply deficit that will likely lead to a recovery in prices.

"We are seeing large tonnages of Colombian coal moving to Asia," said Gresswell, adding this new trade was emblematic of demand growth in Asia drawing tons to the region.

In China, imported thermal coal is competing strongly with Chinese coal, and Beijing's tough stance on capping domestic production is being backed up by mine inspections that could result in some closures of local mines, he said.

Southeast Asia holds the promise of becoming the next India, in Gresswell's eyes, as countries in this region seek to diversify their fuel supply arrangements for electricity generation which is growing at a current rate of 12% per year.

For example, Vietnam's imports of thermal coal could grow to 147 million mt by 2030 from 63 million mt in 2020, he said.

The country is aiming to build 46 new coal-fired power stations ranging in size from 40 MW to 600 MW in capacity.

Fully, 50 GW of new coal-fired power capacity is set to come online in Southeast Asia in the next few years to 2020, and will require an additional requirement for the region of 100 million mt of imported thermal coal, said Gresswell.

Indonesia alone will need to consume an extra 80 million mt of thermal coal for its additional 20 GW of coal-fired power plants by 2020, and most of this supply could come from the country's domestic market.

Given this additional demand growth for thermal coal in Southeast Asia in the coming years, it is difficult to see where the region's additional requirement for 100 million mt will be sourced from.

"There may be some latent tons from the US. Australia is almost tapped out," he said.

Speaking later in a panel discussion, Gresswell expanded on the theme of supply relating to Australia.

"There are no new mines being developed [in Australia]. There are some small expansions, but they are offset by closures," he said.

"Higher prices will incentivize a few additional tons onto the market, but it won't reach 150 million mt," he said.

MORE INQUIRIES FROM SE ASIA

Also during the panel discussion, Sam Fisher, general manager for marketing at Australian coal producer New Hope Coal said: "As a coal producer in the last 12 months we have seen a lot more inquiries coming from Vietnam, and also some inquiries from the Philippines and Malaysia."

India was an arbitrage market for Australian thermal coal that greatly depended on freight differentials, he added.

Gary Vernon, global head of coal trading for Australian bank Macquarie said: "With a low freight environment, Australian coal competes everywhere."

There has been a significant increase in South American demand for Australian thermal coal because of lower vessel freight rates, he said.

Matthew Boyle, principal consultant at commodities analysis and consultancy firm CRU said Australian coal exports had stayed relatively flat, possibly as a result of take-or-pay contracts for rail and port infrastructure used by Australian coal producers.

In China, the central government's policy to restrict domestic coal mines to operating for only 276 days in a calendar year had been a "significant driver" in the recent improvement in prices in the Chinese coal market.

"Not only is it being implemented, but at rates we did not expect," he said of the production restriction.

But, in driving domestic thermal coal prices higher, Beijing's production policy could have an unintended side effect.

"Now, with [domestic] prices getting close to Yuan 500/mt [FOB Qinhuangdao for 5,500 kcal/kg NAR thermal coal] there is the potential for some cut production to come back online," he said.

China's domestic coal industry is "massively fragmented" with 10,800 individual mines spread over the country, and 7,000 of these have a capacity of under 300,000 mt/year.

"The smallest mines only make up 10% of production," he said.

Beijing is aiming to eliminate 500 million mt of production capacity in China's domestic coal industry over a three-to-five year period, but even if it was to achieve this outcome, it would not be enough to improve the sector's overall profitability, he said.

For Japan, which restarted its fifth nuclear power reactor a couple of weeks ago, its coal demand is forecast to be 130 million mt by 2020 and focused mostly on imported fuel with an energy content of more than 5,700 kcal/kg NAR, said Boyle.

South Korean import demand for thermal coal was seen by Boyle as staying relatively steady at around 85 million to 90 million mt/year.

Southeast Asia is also viewed by Boyle as a bright spot for thermal coal demand and the region is expected to require an additional 65 million mt of higher-grade bituminous thermal coal by 2020.

"We are extremely positive on thermal coal demand in Southeast Asian countries," he said.

"Most of the demand for thermal coal will come from Malaysia and Thailand and will continue out to 2020," he stated.

China is starting to retire some older coal-fired power stations and for environmental reasons, leading to 137 GW of generating capacity for this fuel being taken offline by 2020, although the country will add 23 GW of coal-fired electricity generation in 2016 alone, he added.

India's imports of thermal coal were projected to be 65 million to 70 million mt by the year 2020 by Amit Kumar, head of coal sourcing and power trading at Jindal Steel & Power.

Though he said he believed there would be a shift to higher calorific value thermal coal in the years ahead, that would offset declining trade volumes.

"Sponge iron and cement plants will continue to import coal from South Africa and Australia," he said.

Coastal power plants in India with a combined generating capacity of 10 GW to 12 GW will remain dependent on imported cargoes too, he added.

source:(Platts)